Home / Procedures / Laser Hair Removal / Questions

Questions

Laser Hair Removal questions

Answers drawn from published studies, FDA clearances and Florida rules. Treatment depends on an exam by a licensed medical provider.

Answers

What patients ask

Is laser hair removal permanent?

It is a permanent reduction, not permanent removal. FDA clearances define permanent hair reduction as a long-term, stable drop in regrowing hairs at 6, 9 and 12 months after the treatment course. ASPS says it does not guarantee permanent removal and maintenance may be needed.[1][2][3]

How many sessions do I need?

The AAD says most patients need 2 to 6 treatments, 4 to 6 weeks apart. ASPS says most people need 4 to 6 sessions. The first treatment reduces hair about 10% to 25%.[1][2]

Why does it take several sessions?

Only follicles in the growth phase (anagen) respond. In a 1998 study, catagen and telogen follicles resisted laser pulses. Each session reaches the follicles that are growing at that time.[1][2]

Which laser is safest for dark skin?

The long-pulsed 1064 nm Nd:YAG. A 2013 review calls it the best laser for pigmented skin. In 20 women with skin types IV to VI it gave 70% to 90% reduction at 12 months. Long-pulse diode and alexandrite lasers have also been used in skin types IV to VI. A 2026 review advises against IPL in these skin types.[1][2][3]

Does it work on blonde, red, gray or white hair?

Poorly. The light targets melanin, so dark hair responds best. A 2002 review names light-colored hair as the remaining challenge.[1][2][3]

What is the difference between laser and IPL?

A laser emits one wavelength. IPL is a filtered flashlamp with a broad spectrum, about 590 to 1200 nm. A Cochrane review found about 50% short-term reduction with alexandrite and diode lasers and little randomized evidence for IPL.[1][2][3]

Is laser hair removal better than electrolysis?

Faster. In a split-armpit trial, alexandrite laser cleared 74% of hair at 6 months against 35% for electrolysis and was 60 times faster. Before lasers, electrolysis was the only method that offered permanent removal, but it treats one hair at a time.[1][2][3]

Do at-home laser and IPL devices work?

In the short term. A 2012 systematic review found hair reduction of 6% to 72% with home devices, from studies with no randomized trials. In a 2015 trial, an 810 nm home laser cut growing hair up to 59%, but hair returned when use stopped.[1][2][3]

Does it hurt, and is numbing cream safe?

Patients describe the pulses as warm pinpricks or a snapped rubber band. The FDA warns against over-the-counter numbing products with more than 4% lidocaine, heavy use over large areas and covering treated skin, because of heart rhythm problems and seizures.[1][2]

Who can perform laser hair removal in Florida?

Physicians (MD and DO) may perform it. A 2019 Florida House staff analysis states that physician assistants and advanced practice nurses may perform it under physician supervision. Electrologists may use FDA-cleared devices only after required training and certification, under the direct supervision of a trained physician, on site or by telehealth within 150 miles, under Rule 64B8-56.002. A physician may supervise no more than 4 electrologists.[1][2][3]

Sources

Sources

Checked 2026-10-25. Every fact links to its source.

  1. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis. Science, 1983
  2. Grossman MC et al. Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1996
  3. Dierickx CC et al. Permanent hair removal by normal-mode ruby laser. Arch Dermatol, 1998
  4. Lin TY et al. Hair growth cycle affects hair follicle destruction by ruby laser pulses. J Invest Dermatol, 1998
  5. Campos VB et al. Ruby laser hair removal: long-term efficacy and side effects. Lasers Surg Med, 2000
  6. Campos VB et al. Hair removal with an 800-nm pulsed diode laser. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2000
  7. Adrian RM, Shay KP. 800 nm diode laser hair removal in African American patients. J Cutan Laser Ther, 2000
  8. Ibrahimi OA, Kilmer SL. Long-term evaluation of an 800-nm diode laser with vacuum-assisted suction. Dermatol Surg, 2012
  9. Garcia C et al. Alexandrite laser hair removal is safe for Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI. Dermatol Surg, 2000
  10. Gorgu M et al. Comparison of alexandrite laser and electrolysis for hair removal. Dermatol Surg, 2000
  11. Alster TS et al. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser-assisted hair removal in pigmented skin. Arch Dermatol, 2001
  12. Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG hair removal in all skin types. Dermatol Surg, 2004
  13. Nanni CA, Alster TS. Topical carbon solution and Q-switched Nd:YAG hair removal. Arch Dermatol, 1997
  14. Rogers CJ et al. Carbon-assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG and long-pulsed alexandrite: a comparative study. Dermatol Surg, 1999
  15. Nanni CA, Alster TS. Side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG, ruby and alexandrite hair removal (900 treatments). J Am Acad Dermatol, 1999
  16. Gold MH et al. Long-term epilation using the EpiLight intense pulsed light system. Dermatol Surg, 1997
  17. Gold MH et al. One-year follow-up using an intense pulsed light source. J Cutan Laser Ther, 1999
  18. Weiss RA et al. Hair removal with a filtered flashlamp intense pulsed light source. Lasers Surg Med, 1999
  19. Haedersdal M, Gotzsche PC. Laser and photoepilation for unwanted hair growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006
  20. Liew SH. Laser hair removal: guidelines for management. Am J Clin Dermatol, 2002
  21. Dierickx CC. Hair removal by lasers and intense pulsed light sources. Semin Cutan Med Surg, 2000
  22. Dierickx CC. Hair removal by lasers and intense pulsed light sources. Dermatol Clin, 2002
  23. Ibrahimi OA et al. Laser hair removal. Dermatol Ther, 2011
  24. Gan SD, Graber EM. Laser hair removal: a review. Dermatol Surg, 2013
  25. Lee SS et al. Noninvasive cosmetic treatments for Fitzpatrick IV-VI. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2026
  26. Altshuler GB et al. Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med, 2001
  27. Cotsarelis G et al. Label-retaining cells reside in the bulge area of the pilosebaceous unit. Cell, 1990
  28. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol, 1988
  29. Goldman L et al. Effect of the laser beam on the skin III. J Invest Dermatol, 1964
  30. Richards RN, Meharg GE. Electrolysis: observations from 13 years and 140,000 hours. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1995
  31. Thaysen-Petersen D et al. Systematic review of light-based home-use hair removal devices. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2012
  32. Thaysen-Petersen D et al. Low-fluence home-device laser: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol, 2015
  33. Snast I et al. Paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser and light hair removal: meta-analysis. Am J Clin Dermatol, 2021
  34. Inoue Y et al. Factors that induce paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser hair removal. Aesthet Surg J, 2024
  35. Qeyam H et al. Paradoxical hypertrichosis after alexandrite facial hair removal. Lasers Med Sci, 2025
  36. Jalian HR et al. Litigation risk with laser surgery by nonphysician operators. JAMA Dermatol, 2014
  37. Khalifian S et al. Causes of injury and litigation in cutaneous laser surgery, 2012 to 2020. Dermatol Surg, 2022
  38. FDA, 510(k) K180353, diode laser hair removal device, indications and permanent hair reduction definition, 2018
  39. FDA, 510(k) K963947, EpiLaser normal-mode ruby laser, cleared 1997-03-05
  40. FDA, 510(k) K962446, Sharplan ruby laser system, cleared 1997-03-07
  41. FDA, 510(k) K963249, EpiLight Hair Removal System, cleared 1997-07-07
  42. FDA, 510(k) K982940, LightSheer pulsed diode array laser, cleared 1999-04-08
  43. FDA, 510(k) K090820 summary, TRIA over-the-counter laser hair removal system, 2009
  44. FDA, warning on topical pain relief products for cosmetic procedures, 2024-03-26
  45. American Academy of Dermatology, Laser hair removal: FAQs
  46. American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Laser hair removal
  47. American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Laser hair removal risks and safety
  48. Florida Administrative Code, Rule 64B8-56.002 (flrules.org), effective 2021-03-11
  49. Rule 64B8-56.002 F.A.C., Equipment and Devices; Protocols for Laser and Light-Based Devices, full text
  50. Florida House of Representatives, staff analysis of HB 329, Laser Hair Removal or Reduction, 2019